Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Meiping vase marked Ming but I doubt it

In Asian > Chinese Pottery > Show & Tell and Pottery > Show & Tell.
ho2cultcha's loves792 of 22497Authentic Ming dynasty peirod Chinese Blue and White plate with rare chrysanthemum shape19thc 'Wanli 'Polychrome Charger
4
Love it
0
Like it

chen50chen50 loves this.
ho2cultchaho2cultcha loves this.
LovelyPatLovelyPat loves this.
auraaura loves this.
See 2 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 10 years ago

    Offcenter
    (1 item)

    From an estate sale in Houston. No information available. Marked Ming, Wanli reign but I know that doesn't mean it's so. About a foot tall. A free oral appraisal put the value at about $3,000 three or four years ago. Later another guy said it was worth less than $200. Anybody got any ideas. I haven't found another one like it anywhere. I'd call it nice pottery not porcelain. I mainly want to know its approximate age and where it was made. Would appreciate any help I can get.

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Chinese Pottery
    See all
    18th c Antique Qing Dynasty Chinese Yixing Zisha Clay Teapot Kangxi
    18th c Antique Qing Dynasty Chinese...
    $810
    CHINESE 19TH CENTURY CELADON PORCELAIN VASE QIANLONG MARK QING DYNASTY
    CHINESE 19TH CENTURY CELADON PORCEL...
    $40
    18th c Antique Qing Dynasty Chinese Yixing Zisha Clay Teapot Kangxi
    18th c Antique Qing Dynasty Chinese...
    $510
    Festcool Retro Antique Like Style Blue and White Porcelain Dragon Ceramic Cov...
    Festcool Retro Antique Like Style B...
    $35
    logo
    18th c Antique Qing Dynasty Chinese Yixing Zisha Clay Teapot Kangxi
    18th c Antique Qing Dynasty Chinese...
    $810
    See all

    Comments

    1. apostata apostata, 6 years ago
      actually i thought i could read chinese , well thats that seems to be megalomany of mine apparently , because this is hard to read ,

      a sort of Chongzhen 1628-1643 ( long shot ) even when it might be real , i think there is almost no market for this , i don,t think it is much value
    2. apostata apostata, 2 years ago
      they stilized it wrong , it is ineed wanli, i ran the bottom and the sedimentation is is total bogus

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.